PROPOSED CHANGES FOR SEPT. 16, 2015 GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING

Download Proposed ONG Bylaws for Sept 16-2015 Gen MS mtg

ONG BYLAWS

PROPOSED CHANGES FOR SEPT. 16, 2015 GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING

 

Housekeeping – Update name of The Newspaper Guild to The NewsGuild (as per name change approved at the January 2015 TNG Sector Conference)

  • Bylaws Cover Page
  • Page 1 – Bylaws title
  • Page 2 – 1. INTERPRETATION – 2 changes: Clause 1.05; 1.12

 

  1. BARGAINING

Proposing changes to 10.01.02; 10.01.03; 10.01.05

 

10.01     Composition of a Collective Bargaining Committee

.01   Negotiators in collective bargaining on behalf of the ONG or any of its units shall be elected by members of the unit concerned.

 

.02   Each department shall be entitled to a representative on the bargaining committee. Nominations for the committee shall be made by and from the department concerned. should be made by and from the department concerned, but, in the event that no such nomination is made, nominations may be made by any member of the unit for representation of that department.

 

.03   A unit meeting to select bargaining committee representatives shall be scheduled. held by the members of the department. A minimum of five days notice shall be given of such meeting. Voting shall be by secret ballots cast by the members present at the meeting.

 

.04   In the event that a unit consists of one department only, that unit shall elect a minimum of two and a maximum of four negotiators, except where joint bargaining with another Guild unit takes place. In the event of such joint bargaining, the single-department unit shall elect the same number of negotiators as each department in the other unit or units involved in the joint bargaining, unless the Executive Committee deems it wise to permit two negotiators to be elected from the single-department unit.

 

.05   In the event that no member of a department is willing to accept nomination or a quorum is not available at the unit nominating meeting time and place, the Executive Committee may appoint any member to represent that department.

 

.06   The Executive Committee shall appoint a primary spokesperson for the bargaining committee.

 

10.02   Any proposed agreement arrived at in negotiations shall be submitted to CWA/SCA Canada for approval and shall be ratified by the Executive Committee of the ONG and the membership concerned before signing.

 

10.03   In the event of joint bargaining that includes units of the Guild and/or other unions, the units concerned may enlarge their bargaining committees to include the bargaining committees of all other units or unions involved in the joint bargaining.

 

Retirement Planning Course

This two day course is being held on Saturday May 2nd & May 9th, 2015 from 9:00am to 4:00pm in the CLC Boardroom 1st Floor, 2841 Riverside Drive, Ottawa.  The cost is $50.00 per person for the meals and course materials provided at the two Saturday sessions; please make the cheque payable to “Ottawa Area Council CURC”.  To register & pay to confirm your spot please contact Evert Hoogers by email: evert.hoogers@gmail.com and mail payment to: 182 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1R 7J4.   Thank you.

Final version of pre-retirement flyer May 2015

http://ottawanewsguild.ca/website/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Final-version-of-pre-retirement-flyer-May-2015.pdf

Call for stable, long-term funding for our Public Broadcaster

 

 

Hi everyone,

As you likely know, the CBC announced another 244 job cuts last week as part of its self-destructive plan to chop 1,500 – many of them our CWA Canada brothers and sisters. We have launched a Save the CBC campaign and we will be working hard in the coming months to make stable CBC funding an issue in this year’s election campaign.

We will send out information about how you can help, but in the meantime you can do one thing – right now. Please take two minutes to visit this website and send a petition to the government:

https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/champion-cbc-defendons-src

Solidarity,
Martin

Martin O’Hanlon
President, CWA/SCA Canada

Copyright © 2015 CWA Canada Retirees Council, All rights reserved.

http://cwa-scacanada.ca/retirees/EN/

 

Posted in CBC |

National election at CWA Canada under way

2015.03.26

This is a national election year for CWA Canada and the nomination period is now open for two senior leadership positions.

All members are eligible to run for office or nominate someone as a candidate for President and/or Vice-president, the posts currently held by Martin O’Hanlon and Lois Kirkup, respectively.

The deadline for submitting nominations is noon on Thursday, April 16.

If an election is required, a campaign and voting period of 35 days would immediately follow, during which each union Local can decide how it wants to conduct the vote.

Locals can opt to hold a vote in the workplace or have ballots sent directly to members who would then mail them to head office in Ottawa in a prepaid envelope.

The President of CWA Canada, which is a full-time paid position, and the Vice-president serve four-year terms.

The official election notice and nomination form are available on the CWA|SCA Canada website.

——————————————————————————

For more information, contact CWA|SCA Canada Election Committee member Scott Edmonds.

================================================

LINKS:

election notice

http://www.cwa-scacanada.ca/documents/pdf/2015/150326_elxn_notice.pdf

nomination form (bilingual)

http://www.cwa-scacanada.ca/documents/pdf/2015/150326_nominate.pdf

Scott Edmonds

tsedmonds@yahoo.ca

PRESIDENT’S COLUMN: DIGITAL MEDIA WORKERS EYE ORGANIZING

March 4, 2015

IN January, the Washington Post reported on the city’s latest “scandal.”

Evidently, a union organizing drive was underway in a digital-news shop. The “threat” was so real that a right-wing anti-taxer vowed to help fight off the terrible union.

That audacious union was ours.

What the Post didn’t know is that we routinely get phone calls from digital-media employees curious about organizing. Some of those calls turn into full-fledged drives. Others don’t. Or they aren’t public yet as pro-union employees work behind the scenes building support

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that workers like the idea of democracy in the workplace. Despite all the ill-informed badmouthing of unions, surveys show that most workers would join a union given the opportunity. Grievously, the damage that corporations, anti-union politicians and the courts have done to labor law over the years limits those opportunities.

When employees at digital publications call us, they are as likely to talk about working conditions as wages. This is especially true as workers get into their late 20’s and early 30’s—when they’ve decided they want a life as well as a job.

We help these workers any way we can. If they decide to organize, they are in control of the process. They decide what’s important and what a fair contract would look like.

It should go without saying that it’s invaluable to have a signed document that states what the rules are, as well as minimum standards for wages and benefits. You’ll never find an executive who hasn’t negotiated a contract—typically a highly favorable one with a fat exit package even if he or she is fired.

In the turbulent industry that is media today, these conversations are more important than ever. While some employers are smart enough to pay for quality journalism, others see a sea of laid-off writers and editors and scheme to get as much work out of them as possible at the lowest cost. Some are so arrogant and brazen that they use the “cachet” of a byline to barter for work with no pay.

But even the worst of those employers aren’t the parasites that are Google, Facebook and other content aggregators that effectively steal revenue from news organizations.

Whether your organization is all-digital or still has a print component, Google and its ilk are taking advantage. Google would have you believe that its own genius is responsible for its wealth—nearly $5 billion in profit in the last quarter of 2014, up 30 percent from the same quarter in 2013. In fact, those billions are siphoned from your labor and others’ investment.

Fresh, quality, credible information is a precious resource. It gets more valuable every day, as once-proud and respected news organizations slash jobs and wages. As new employers attempt to fill the gaping hole in the quality and quantity of bona fide journalism, it is vital that workers have a voice.

I noted that some people feel threatened by unions and purposely distort what we do, throwing around phrases like “union bosses” and “union thugs.” They want workers to see unions as outsiders who would exploit them. We know that nothing could be further from the truth.

But they spread those lies because workplace democracy is the last thing they want. They demand no limits on their power and greed. They see unions as a threat because history proves how effective we are at improving workers’ lives. They know that unions did, in fact, create America’s now-disappearing middle class.

Unions aren’t the enemy of management. We can and do work with employers to build better products and stronger companies. In our field, no one cares more about the product—journalism—than journalists themselves. When we can negotiate fair wages, benefits and working conditions, quality journalism thrives.

The loudmouth union-haters on certain TV networks and radio shows, have done a huge disservice to the many Americans who are told nothing about the democratic nature of unions and how we function.

There’s nothing “shocking” about journalists or any other workers trying to form a union. They are ordinary people who want some control over their work lives. You may be one of those people. Give us a call. You’ll be in good company.